>>97252309>Ah so basically white guys are going 6/10 wouldn't bang.Yeah, pretty much.
>>97252173>So you can explain his Chicago just had 100 days of straight shootings?Chicago has a population of about 3 million and it has always had problems with violence even when it was majority white. I believe the violent crime rate in Chicago in the 90's was something like 3-5 times what it is today.
>Not to mention that you didn't disprove my point.Your "point" is disproven by the very source that you claimed. You claimed that FBI statistics show that blacks commit a majority of the crimes in the US. That's false. Why do t you actually go read the damn UCR and stop boring me with your bullshit?
>Black men are roughly 5% of the population but are still the perpetrators of most crime in the country.Hmm, that's actually false. Blacks commit disproportionate crime but not the most crime.
>no argument beyond projectionThat's all you've been doing this entire time.
>"it's not that bad, they're just catching a large amount of nogs committing one single crime and they're still shooting each other in disproportionate numbers but they're lower now
That's not exactly what I said. I said that the UCR only shows arrests as opposed to crimes and illustrated why that's an important distinction. Also yeah, blacks still shoot blacks just as whites still fucking shoot whites. The point is that those rates have been going down over the past couple years as a variety of factors normalize. What will you say in 20-30 years when crime rates in the black community are no longer overrepresented?
