>>96999011Not really, been so much propaganda trying to shove this idea into your brain that this law from 2015 is super needed and doesn't mention at all that the 400 page long thing has things that promotes monopolies.
Not saying NN is bad but you retards seem to forget that there are large corporations that has plenty to gain from keeping Net neutrality as well. We all know that monopoly is becoming a problem but the current state of NN treats ISPs as public utilities which int urn means that federal oversight is a must when laying new fiber. This means increased costs and resources.
"No carrier shall undertake the construction of a new line or of an extension of any line, or shall acquire or operate any line, or extension thereof, or shall engage in transmission over or by means of such additional or extended line, unless and until there shall first have been obtained from the Commission a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require the construction, or operation, or construction and operation, of such additional or extended line"
"Upon receipt of an application for any such certificate, the Commission shall cause notice thereof to be given to, and shall cause a copy of such application to be filed with, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State (with respect to such applications involving service to foreign points), and the Governor of each State in which such line is proposed to be constructed, extended, acquired, or operated, or in which such discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service is proposed, with the right to those notified to be heard; and the Commission may require such published notice as it shall determine"
That's state Department, Department of Defense, and the state's Governor that you got to apply to just for laying new fiber. You think you gonna break the monopoly with this shit? Now, I am not saying NN is all bad but there's arguments for and against it is what I'm saying