>>96516414I too, do not understand this.
Good and bad is subjective for most of the cases argued. Noodle arms art style? Wasn't it simple shape/silhouette artstyle during the rise of UPA? So isn't it more accurate to call it artstyle one likes rather than good or bad?
Humor? Lol randumb xD in modern cartoons? But old school Fleischer brothers Popeye was just him punching everything, random bystanders included. It's just the creator's sense of humor. It is totally subjective, isn't it? So shouldn't it be more labelled as brand of humor you understand/like rather than simply go9d or bad?
Frame rates? But that doesn't isn't the only thing that displays movement weight and replication or exaggeration of life. And even that, how much weight and exaggeration to bring out the life, is subjective.
Bunch of faggots, just be happy there is a thing to watch at all.
