>>96202933>80% = 80%
When it's nto 80% of the same thing, it literally isn't>But the argument isn't about how we feel pain,
No, the argument is about the damage done.>None, because in the case of someone smaller responding with equal force at all makes no sense.
It does. Human body resistance is more or less the same for everyoone, else why this is about the dmage done, not about how muyuch effert is put into the attack., meaning that equal force can be enough of a deterrent. You only need to concede a potential pyrrhic victory to deter an attack from someone stronger than you.>If an ex-convict attacks you with a knife and you have both a knife and a gun on your person are you going to pull out the knife or the gun?
We are talking about life and eath situation , there, which you yourself ruled out of that conversation, so don't bring it back.
We are limiting our conversation to physical assault with no irreversible damages and the point is, you respond with equal force, or you are in the wrong.
If someone attack you, you retaliate with the same strength. You do not start making a chart of the evaluated maximum force your opponent has and then try to figure out how his attack was proportionally to the force he attacked you with. ,That's fucking stupid.
Someone attack you with a certain strength, you retaliate with the same strength and don't try to make any guesswork that is more than likely to be wrong and no matter what unequal.