>>95971374Exactly what I was thinking. I'm trying to parse this shit out for my own sanity.
>Eye opening exchange with cool seeming kidsHarmon talked to some kids (teens? young adults maybe?)
>hoping to drag my fat assThreatening him
>cuz my angle in the nugget spat was classistLosing me here. His "angle" meaning his part in it? Or his goal?
>I see that. Not good.I'm glad this all makes sense to you, Dan.
>should've left that piece til morning - wasn't drunk, was half asleepI hate reading fucking twitter, I can never tell when shit was posted. I'm guessing the first part of this post is from the previous night but the timestamp on the first one and the time lapsed on the following posts doesn't tell me how far apart they are.
>would've edited to use terms more personal, less..faction associableLost me again. Guessing he thinks his first post led people to assume (correctly guess?) that he was talking about black people.
>If you know my schtick, you know, hypocritically or not, I talk a game pretty left We get it Dan, you're so progressive.
>of "you work at McDonalds so you suck." Unintended angle.Is he talking about his first post here or is he talking about the "angle in the nugget spat" thing or what I feel like I'm in some kind of lefty gentle talk rat maze.
>A dude broke it down from the top Guy explained to him, sure
>in a way that made me realize THAT was a perception and I see that now and it's mortifying.THAT being, I assume, "you work at McDonalds so you suck", but could mean the whole classist thing or they could both be the same thing, who the fuck knows.
Am I on target here? This shit still doesn't make any sense, what was the point of this post?