>>95906890>you're arguing that it's acceptable for other methods of killing to exist simply because they aren't guns
You're the one arguing that there should be no regulation. I do think there should be regulation on guns and knifes. You shouldn't be allowed to drive without a license and psichiatric tests, and you shouldn't be allowed to walk around with knifes freely (also ban on the type of knife). >Most criminals avoid confrontations with people they believe to be armed
No, they just blow your brains before you can react if they think you are armed. What confrontatin there is to it? you really think you will react faster than a guy pointing a gun to your back?
If you're inside your house, that is a different story. You should be able to keep a gun in your house, but walking around with it is fucking retarded. >there's no such thing as no background check when you buy a weapon
gun shows says hi. >that shit happened almost twenty years ago, things have changed
Was there any new regulation on online sales after Columbine? because it seems that you can still buy guns online. >A fucking mythbusters video
oh look, so if you have a TV show, or a shooting range, or you plan on displaying the gun, you can have a machine gun. >what makes you think your retarded assumptions around gun control will work
Canada and Australia. >the last shooting happened with illegally obtained and modified weapons
No; he obtained most of his 30 guns legally, and from the guns he used on the massacre two were found to be legal and the others "could be obtained legally", as we don't have confirmation for all of them.