still, if it did not exist, we would make it.>>95674175
i think literally beating kids, encouraging bullying, and abstaining from ever showing affection is far more responsible for sociopathy, pleasureseeking, and running away. authoritarianism means that some peoples wishes absolutely shouldn't be considered, and, especially when such rules are arbitrary, that will naturally lead to folks running away to seek better opportunities somewhere else, both literally and figuratively.
i also find it very hard to believe that there was ever a formalized instruction in favor of 'free love', especially by marxists, who are arguably even worse on sexuality than even christians. the idea is literally laughable, and i would like to see some proof of marxist thinkers or officials prescribing free love. not in fiction, but in philosophy and prescribed policy. i literally can't even think the words, 'marxist free love' without scoffing. i need to see a prescription.
as far as i know, free love is some hippy / crusty bullshit that came with the use of drugs, especially psychedelics.
communists tend to believe that looking even remotely appealing or seductive or sexually distinct is bougeois patriarchy and oppression. there is ample proof of this.
at best, i can accept that you are conflating the administration of public schools, which were then a relatively new thing, with youthful behavior at the schools, like teens having sex, and that's being generous.