>>95578303Shit on Cracked if you want, but don't act like that image is anywhere near an accurate representation of them.
For one, they write actual articles. The only time you'll see an entry that's just a series of photos are the user submitted photoplasties and pictofacts.
Any time they delve in to fan theories, they make an actual attempt to argue the case for it. They don't just put up an image or state it as fact.
Several members of their writing staff have written multiple times about how the whole "it's weird so they must have been on drugs" thing is flat out retarded.
Again, if you don't like Cracked, that's fine. But don't go building a strawman just to tear it down.
