>>94867900>Are we really going to resort to this?you literally started it by saying "That's exactly what it means" without actually explaining anything and also completely misrepresenting my argument by substituting your own, easily refutable one
>they have one goalyou can have multiple goals that supplement one larger goal, that still counts
just because they want to make as much money as possible doesn't mean they aren't going to do anything but that
the fact that inclusive commercials exist, when non-inclusive ones are far cheaper, means that they are at least listening to the needs and wants of the consumer and reflecting that
Because if anything, they can only market to people who are willing to buy their stuff and if nobody wants to buy their stuff they have to change
As society progresses, so does the media
>This started because I asked what was wrong with girls playing with lego dollsA question that you only had today, specifically, because of an argument I was already in
You read my argument, had a problem with it, and posted it in this thread so that somebody could respond to it
>I just asked a questionI know
I've already explained how you weren't really arguing, but asking a bunch of questions in an attempt to pedantically prove a point
And for some dumb reason you said I was doing the same thing, probably because you realized you didn't have that great of a point
