>>94100695>By constantly trying to ape Marvel's formula and success?how is it apeing marvels formula?
They're taking the approach in the opposite direction.
>>94100695>Green Lantern was a quipfest that did everything it could to be Iron Man. That was WB's first attempt at a cinematic universe.Which is why they're doing the opposite.
Maybe you didnt notice but Green latern isn't part of the DCEU.
>When that failed, they turned to what they knew had made money with Nolan - grim and dark, but the end-goal was still the same: So how are they apeing the MCU?
>As a result of wanting to reach that big 'ensemble' movie before the craze died down, they rushed BVS together and botched their own extended universe. And now we've gone full circle. WB has realized they can't do funny, nor dark, and has straight up hired the guy who made Avengers 1+2 to fix their faltering movie universe.
Lol, no, they've made financial hits, said fuck the critics, and whedon is only editing 10 minutes of scenes not even shown in the trailer because Zack's daughter died and had to jump ship for the last part of post production.
And whedon is only getting Batgirl, who is a throwaway character.
And faltering?
Its literally the opposite. these movies are whipping the MCUs ass.
THey not only hit it big in theaters but they tend to STAY in theaters and make money and make a shit ton in home movie sales.
Financially and audience wise they're dominating the MCU.
