>>91999432And I don't need to rewrite the script to justify my thoughts, especially if anon is not even going to argue why he thinks it's good other than, "I like it".
If you want an existing example of other shows that did it better, then I can do that, but it's not what other anon wanted. He wanted me to "fix" the problems. Dipper and Mabel are good examples of logic vs. crazy, and it subverts tropes for humorous purposes by having Dipper do things like buy 15 cameras to bypass the whole, "Whoops, we forgot our camera!" cliche and further pushed the joke by having Mabel throw them over board.
OK KO doesn't have the subvert your expectations. It would actually be OK only has one camera and that's the crux of the problem. None of the character interactions were particularly funny. And half the shorts in the OP list rely on "Character awkward drags out bad performance while on camera" gag. It's fucking boring.