>>91725085>I haven't even fucking seen Babadook.Then shut the fuck up.
>So if the creator's efforts appealed to you personally, he's a genius, but if they didn't, he's a retardKeep putting words in my mouth, faggot. Every time a creator says how much effort they put into a bad movie, they deserve to be mocked. End of story.
>b-b-but fear is subjectiveShut up.
>>91725329>How? The framing of the scenes is really effective It's the exact same cinematography you'll in every other single movie like Insidious.
>and allows for really suspenseful scares. Just admit that you have low standards and carry on.
>The music is effective and creates atmosphere well.What atmosphere? The atmosphere is what that shitty movie was devoid of.
And that music is nothing but dull droning I've heard a thousand times before.
>it has no jump scares, so it's goodYou're the kind of an idiot who enables the "movie has no jump scares so it's scary" kind of garbage thinking. It's still the same mood.
> slow build is effectiveIf you're an easily-impressed 13-year old.
>Except the drama is really organicPfft. The drama is hamhanded and handled as unsubtle as it could be.
>And many others agreeIdiots would, maybe.
> it seems like you just like a specific type of horror movie.Yes. It's called a "good movie"
>inb4 hurr le subjective>Your tears are delicious.I'm not the one eating up shit and asking for more, but enjoy being a cancerous lump on the genre enabling shit creators. You deserve every Conjuring.