>>91334247>>91335063There actually was a story here and United Airlines were in the wrong, but not nearly to the degree a lot of people were claiming.
Basically, there were two kids who wanted to get one a flight, one of which was 10, and they were both wearing leggings. The problem is that while yes, it is policy that they were treated as staff and staff have to be more well dressed than normal passengers, it does NOT say anywhere in the rules that leggings are banned. It only says that they must be "dressed properly" and its up to the discretion of whoever letting them on. So basically someone saw two kids wearing leggings and thought "this just wont fly" and so they didn't. While charges of misogyny are 90% bullshit, the dad was later revealed to be wearing shorts, so some people are pointing to that.