>>90305859>picThis argument falls apart on the basis that it equates tradition as correct.
This is demonstrably false, because if you were to apply this same logic to say, medicine, we'd still be using treatments based on how "phlegmatic" or "choleric" a person is.
The same applies to astronomy and geography, with the latter, we would have to consider the Earth as flat, since this is the most ancient and traditional theory, and the former, we should consider the Earth as either the centre of our system, or the universe, either or, really.
Instead, one should use actual arguments instead, and not some bullshit "ancestors smile upon you" piece of over emotional gunk.
You could bring up how multiculturalism has been a failure, not managing to actually unite or mix any cultures, but has instead led to segregation and tribalism, you could point out how Communist theory is based on a boogus interpretation of economics and history, along with human nature in general.
But no, it had to be "a bunch of long decomposed remains would agree with us when they were alive". Fucking hell.