>>88444813>>Marco not attractiveHe's a sperg who spills spaghetti every chance he gets and has unhealthy obsession over her. A realistic kind of character, a normal girl, would call the police on him.
>>thinking that Jackie's developmentWhat development? She didn't develop as a character at all, no change has taken place. She is the exact same character she was when she first appeared on the show. We might now slightly more about her now? But there was no development and even what we know about her is laughable.
>> a chill girl who was on good terms with everyone even the giant sperg that was MarcoProving my point.
>and not slowly becoming even more impressed by his "never give up even if I fuck up" attitude toward herSoooo a proponency for Stockholm syndrome? I don't think that counts as development.
>>implying a princess falling for a peasant like marco is "realistic"See, you're mistaken. I'm not a Starco shipper. I don't much care. I just want good characters and a solid plot. Jackie, as a character, is completely flat. And she strains my suspension of disbelief to a brekaing point, in a series about Magic, Demons, Monsters, Princesses, Interdenominational Travel and Karate. that's should tell you something.
