>>87472553>Ps. English is not my native language
It definitely isn't. My comment wasn't about you, it was about you calling Derrick a pedo on the grounds he just had to add particular details on prepubescent girls to the point many in this thread have stated (myself including) that girls at 10+ can indeed have breasts develop at that age.
Little trivia, the first time I saw bare (naked) female tits irl (not porn/hentai) was back in elementary in 4th grade. 4th. Meaning everyone was at the bare minimum, 9+ years old, and the girl definitely had b size tits. (Before you ask, she didn't have a bra, "training bras" as they were called, and she leaned down forward just enough to have her entire chest exposed through the opening of her shirt at the angle I was looking at her at that moment in time. A true blessing of pure luck, I know, but that's besides the point.)
Point is, just because you've always been as flat as Lucina from moeEmblem, doesn't mean every girl at 10+ (hell, 8/9+ even) grow to not have tits, every girl, every one hits puberty at different times, different ways, all thanks to the shit we eat and the genes your parents "gifted" you at birth.
P.S. If Derrick has child porn on his track record, THAT makes him a pedophile, not drawing girls with tits you fucking dumb broad.