>>87362998>he only approached Marco because he hated him so much.
In the beginning, yes, but when they hung out they found out that they get along really well and found a genuine connection and chemistry. It's even written in the song lyrics.
Tom is a great character. He's being developed really nicely, slowly making his way towards becoming a better person. It's a shame so many people want to insist he's thoroughly terrible and can never develop because the first introduction was so negative.
I've seen the same thing happen in the SU fandom with Jasper though, so I shouldn't be surprised. Some people just want to think that character development should never happen and characters should forever stay in the roles they played when first introduced>And I don't see any romantic chemistry there.
Anon you don't see any romantic subtext in posing two characters like in >>87357621
? You don't think that a love ballad duet with lyrics of>you know I never meant to hurt you, when you're sad you know I'd never desert you>you were my angel, my beautiful dove>we spiraled high on a gust of love, and I knew right from the start nothing could tear us apart
isn't romantic at all?
Honest question, if those lyrics and that song would have been given to Star and Marco, would you think it romantic? Or would you go "ha ha yes they talk of love and breaking hearts and they call each other angel, but it's totes not romantic at all, they're just good friends"?