>>86888529No, it really isn't, and says a lot that you think that way. Here, let me use an example that someone with as little thinking capacity as you might understand:
A man leaves his sandwich on a bench. The man is planning to eat it, but he needs to use the potty and doesn't want to bring his sandwich with him.
Are you following so far?
An incredibly strong gust of wind blows the man's sandwich away. The bench is now empty.
Still with me?
Another man comes along. He, too, has a sandwich. He puts his sandwich on the bench, since he needs to use the potty and doesn't want to bring his sandwich with him.
Hold on to the seat of your pants, because this is going to blow your mind.
The first man comes back from the washroom, takes the sandwich off the bench, and eats it, not paying attention and assuming the sandwich is his.
BOOM! Shocker! What a tweest!
Now, if we use your "b-but you can j-just break it down to the barest form!" The first man is a thief, a criminal, and should be executed for his brazen criminal acts.
However, if you have the mental capacity beyond that of a 3 year old, you can see that despite this shocking crime, the situation is much more complex than its barest elements, and that cordoning everything off into a black and white scenario, ESPECIALLY by oversimplifying a situation, is an incredibly stupid thing to do.
