>>86810004>She said thought it MIGHT work based on her knowledgeThe discussion is not even if she knew it would work or not. This 'trope' you're saying doesn't really exist, and even if it was real she said herself in the end that it doesn't even matter because she knew the 'writer' would make it work anyway.
Again, it could literally be anything-- it could be a book with her face on it. God would make it work.
>What matters is that she has an internally consistent characterizationSHE KILLS THE FAMILY OF A GUY IN THE FIRST GODDAMN ISSUE AND GOT SAD WHEN HE WAS KILLED
fuck, 'internally consistent'.. holy shit, you didn't just said that. Motherfucker.. she is an expert shooter in the first issue and then back to a rookie later on. I know this is explained, but the explanation doesn't make any sense. Fuck.. "connect to her background", but did she ever kill someone before going to comic book land? she acts like a cold serial killer from the get-go instead of a normal comic book geek.
And nice way to avoid explaining why the fuck a cop just decided to stop being a cop just when he arrested her. 'internally consistent' my ass, if deus ex is internally consistent in this comic, it just means the comic is consistently bad!
>And for god's sake, stop using the word 'literally' in every post. You aren't using it correctly>using literally correctyou're in 4chan.
