>>86497181>Or is it a bias against Marvel?It's just MASSIVE contrarianism.
/co/ has always been like this. People like thing? FUCK THING, THING IS TERRIBLE.
You're basically right. None of the Marvel films are really bad. I don't really like Thor or IM2, and I'll admit to not having seen Thor 2, but from what I can tell, these are just mediocre action films with some charming moments/characters dotted around. And as little desire as I have to rewatch, say, Thor, I can recognize that it's not a generic action movie. /co/, with this glut of superhero movies, seems to have forgotten what a terrible generic action movie actually looks like. Protip: it looks like Independence Day II, and Battle: LA, and xXx, and Elektra, and
BvS, and all the other extremely sub-par, literally dull as paint drying tripe that gets released every year.
Compounding this is a small group of delusional diehards that slavishly attack anything Marvel makes out of pure company loyalty, not because they truly think their films are bad, but because they are absolutely desperate to convince themselves that they and Warner Bros are 'winning' somehow. These people are the bane of discussion, because they're not there to find any kind of truth or meaning, they're just sorely in need of validation, and the only way they know how to get it - or get some pretense of it - is to lie endlessly to themselves and others about movies of all things. You get people like this in every fanbase unfortunately.
