>>86442202>I can't really find that anywhere.
Yeah, it seems to be deleted on both ends, including the reassuring ask i sent the kid. dunno.>And she doesn't seem to be doing it now, does she?
I haven't seen any more in the last two months or so, but I don't see what that has to do with anything.>And almost half the criticism lodged at her is under the belief that webcomic artists can't have flaws, a personal life, or basic human imperfection.
...no? People are callin' mad shit about Gigi and I used Viv as an example of similar flaws but worse. I don't expect her to be perfect, I'm just saying she's a whiny bitch. Anyone who acts the way she does is.
You're acting like I'm expecting her to be better than a normal person, but I'm not. I'm saying she's less pleasant than normal, and giving her a pass on that because she sometimes makes comics is stupid.>I'm not really happy with her work ethic as of late but I'm not gonna shit all over her for it.
What do you mean "shitting on"? That would imply I'm unjustly criticizing her for whining about the money she makes to rarely do her job. Am I shitting on someone who only goes to work one week a month if I say "They barely do their work"?>But hey, this is the internet, why should I expect fair, mature critique and debate?
What the fuck does that mean?
Where does "unfair" or "immature" come in when I say someone who rarely does what they're paid for and whines about their pay is a lazy bitch? With calling someone who talks shit to fans, sometimes actual god damn kids, a nasty person?
Like you're not even DISAGREEING, you're saying I'm being too harsh. If I was being unfair or immature, you'd be saying I'm lying, or that I'm fabricating issues to make her look bad.
But you're not.
You're telling me to stop saying negative things about her not because they're untrue, but because it makes her look bad, which in turn makes you feel bad.