>>85487892Semantics about /co/ or part of /co/, you made a fairly general vague accusation to perceived group.
Which you yourself kind of just argued against here.
>instead of pushing the same "us or them" attitude that clearly seems to get to youWhich I did no such thing of, I am specifically referring to you and your words not a group, just you, I'm criticizing just you but whatever lets ignore that point.
Are you also going to address this part or no? Are you going to tell me what you actually meant and how I'm conflating or misunderstanding you?
>And yes, you CAN and should get fired if you can't conduct yourself at the very least properly enough so that you don't instigate tumblr teens into sending you shot by dating them and giving them a venue to do so through her job.Your paragraph in it's totality has a clear theme of absolving and minimizing the doxxers of responsibility by assuming that they are just teens, I'm sure there are plenty of adults on Tumblr, and in your other response by comparing them to unthinking hornets, they are not insects, they don't operate on basic instinct, well I hope not,while at the same putting near full responsibility on Pleb, not just of her actions but also the actions of those that targeted her.
I myself can simply say doxxing is wrong, I will never support it, nor anyone that does it, I have no qualms about that but you seem to have a vested interest in excusing, rationalizing the practice, maybe you yourself support it, as some of your statements seem to elude to or maybe you yourself are guilty of such but then this is just speculation, which I can only do as to why you have taken the stance that you have.
But I can without scruples say doxxers are infantile, petty, irrational, vindictive pieces of shit.
Maybe you yourself should take that that stance in the future too, it'll reflect better on you.
