>>84202117this, and single-handedly destroy the economy by pushing scaremongering headlines about what turned out to be a brief bump in gas prices, leading to massive layoffs and permanent rises in bus fares
>>84202132to be fair net neutrality was never explained well. For the majority of the issue, it had been explained to me (by both sides) that they were trying to ban rich companies from buying higher quality pipelines while leaving everyone else the same, NOT that they were going to be keeping the same quality while others would get shafted. There's a big fucking difference.
study after study shows that people will invariably vote for whatever seems more fair, even if it means everyone, on average or individually, does worse. most recently mythbusters did an experiment with a different version of grocery checkout lines... it was much slower, but the lines were more even so people said they found it more satisfying
