>>82883646>Star>fully developedWhat because she finished Mewberty? We don't even know if there are more stages or even more to Mewman cycles.
Then again you'd have to be ten times as retarded to argue jacking it to a cartoon is even consequential enough to worry about in the first place.
More to the point
>>82881336It's a decent show. Nobody on /co/ will ever tell you it's amazing, because it isn't. At the same time don't believe anyone that says it's the worst thing ever, because it's not. Even taking into account the worst parts of the show it's still a largely noticeable margin from being even nearly as bad as some people express.
The first few episodes are generally the worst in presentation and weaker than later episodes overall, so I wouldn't let that crash your opinion if you have the guts to stick around.
Generally it boils down to:
Pros:
+Fantastic lead pair dynamic
+Great formula
+Humor is mostly good, especially when it tries
+Toffee, even though introduced late into the first season, is a character everyone seems to like; even those that don't fancy the show
Neutral:
*Episode quality fluctuates rather strongly, some episodes are decent, some are great, some are fantastic, some are just meh, some are just ones you don't wanna touch again
Cons:
-Really rough start
-Occasionally has its really bad flubs
-Some vital parts just lack punch in its delivery and pacing
-You will want to drop the show because of the pony (she only appears in two episodes thankfully)
It's one of those shows you seriously need to watch on your own to form your own opinion. It's probably the most variable-in-reception cartoon I've ever seen in my life.
If it's not your thing, that's not abnormal. If it is though, great.
