>>78176118So is your problem that you hate legacies or just legacies that aren't the same race and/or gender of the character they're replacing? Because I see this argument a lot and it always rings hollow because the you always focus on race/gender and not the fact that they're legacies.
Did you hate Wally West? Did you hate Kyle Rainer? How about Jaime Reyes or when DickBats? Why does a legacy character HAVE to be the same race/gender as their predecessor?
Your complaint is that they aren't making new characters as if Sam Wilson is literally Steve Rogers, or Jane Foster is literally Thor Odinson, or Amadeus Cho is Bruce Banner.
I can understand not liking legacy characters, but when the argument always comes back to "they're not straight white men anymore and that triggers me" then it makes me question which part is the one that actually bothers you. That's not to say you can't have a problem with legacy characters. Back in the 90s, plenty of people were too hot on all the legacy characters DC was pumping out, but personally, I have a lot of fond memories of those characters and like legacy characters.
But nowadays, if I say I like legacy characters, I get labelled as an SJW just because the legacy character isn't a straight white man. And that's what pisses me off about your faggy little culture war. You SJWs and anti-SJWs only seem to care about race and gender. You're all a bunch of racist, sexist cunts that act like "n-no it's the OTHER SIDE that's wrong" when you're both fucking awful and degrade the quality of discussion of every single thing you touch.
You can't just have a nice conversation abotu characterization because characterization begins and ends at race/gender/sexuality. You can't have legacy characters without it being some big political fight. A comic can't just be a comic, now it has to be some big controversial meme so you people can have yet another thing to jack each other off over.
