>>77358089 Is like talking to a wall. All that matters is that you want to talk shit about somebody, so logic be damned, and anyone that speaks against it is being hypocritical.
I mean, otherwise define Irony, because this clearly doesn't fit. All I am telling you is that this doesn't make sense, and I am not about to let anyone here think they are making sense if they are not.
So what? By telling people they are making no sense with their fake criticism I am inquiring in irony. How mutherfucker? explain properly too.
I never said you are not allowed to criticise people, not in any of the multiple answer I wasted my time writing, just that claiming baseless arguments are real criticism is ridiculous, or that attacking somebody out of jealousy and believe you have the higher ground is not something one should do consciously.
>>77358036>No, I can call him names because I can say anything I like, Justified or not. This I can accept and even celebrate, so long as people acep they are talking shit for the simple sake of talking shit. Who gives a crap anyway.
>>77358152 What are you? Stupid?
Because it comes down to that if that's all you can say about this topic.
To begin with with that logic I can go ahead and talk shit about you over this topic all the same, and by censuring or ignoring me you are being hypocritical on your principles, but what really ticks here is that there is difference on claiming you have some sort of superior point of view without real logic to back it up and to simply say whatever you want about somebody.
Don't expect people to just agree with you if you actually want to offer and opinion, I don't agree with this crazy custom of talking shit while believing to have some sort of truth backing you up.
>>77358025Funny how you use a Strawmen against that argument. Real funny.
