>>77067747No, because that's addressing omnipotence as it affects omnipotence.God doing things to god is practically unspeakable, we don't have the logical expressions to discuss that kind of scenario. Arguably, we don't have them to express anything like omnipotence, but I'm maintaining that omnipotence as it applies to limited entities is comprehensible.
I can know exactly everything that you're going to do without affecting your decision capacity in any sense. Dogma maintains that God exists 'timelessly', so he doesn't make you at point X, set you in linear motion through time T, and watch you fuck up at time Y.
Rather, he exists all through the entirety of time. Your life just is, it doesn't happen. You're thinking that an omnipotent being is limited to the constraints that you are limited to, such as linear time.
>>77067787If you set down the rules for your dog, the dog understands them and could have followed them, and it chooses not, to then you're justified in being upset at it. Knowing that a thing will happen doesn't mean that you're causally responsible for it, especially if you're an omnipotent entity which isn't bound by any restraint like causality or temporality.