>>126822125And where did i talk about that? And where was this bad behaviour mentioned by stonetoss?
Dont move the goal post if your reading comprehension skills is on the level of a seal.
>>126822273And this is conected to the critic on a stonetoss comic because...? No, i really want to know what this has to do with the science discussion and their alarmism. Or is this just a cope and easy cop out excuse for you to do anything and roll in your self selected role as a victim?
>>126823388>4%Can be alot. And this amount is the reason why we still can do something.
>methaneYes? And this is mentioned by science. And this is why they want you to eat the bug.
>Or that Greenland was warm enough for agriculture a thousand years ago?It wasnt. It was more than just a thousand years ago.
>as science by any definition of the wordAnd nobody does that, only bible fags do that by insisting the bible said so.
