>>124744909More or less. It's simply just 'now you can do it' and you take it too far and too often. You've replaced nuance with this giddy sense you are now free to do anything.
it's why a lot of the best stuff is 'art from adversity' because you have to work around limitations and you create something truly special you put your all into making because it's so hard to do, but once you're given complete freedom, you kind of go overboard.
People think 'oh it's an agenda, it's virtue signallng, it's this or that' but really what it boils down to is that LGBT was free game for the market to sell, people wanted to feel good about themselves, and it created a big boom of 'let's follow the leader' and try to recreate that economic success by honing on on what made it so big in the first place. 'LGBT' means LGBT sells and everyone will do it until LGBT stops being such a marketable thing, and then the trend will begin again with something else.
It happens every single time and people never realize it. People get so worked up over gay stuff in media when they should be mad they're lazy hacks who are trying to ride a fad while having no real limits, so they go overboard or worse, try to outdo each other in attempt to eat into the other's demographics.
The gays aren't ruining your TV, it's literally just the producers trying to make the fastest, best buck at the cost of your entertainment, no matter what's popular.
