>>124633286Depends on what you mean by far-left. She comes from a monarchist society, which by its nature goes toward the right-wing in one sense (tradition and hierarchy), but it wouldn’t align much with American conservatives or progressives, which are both forms of political liberalism opposed to monarchy and legal hereditary succession. She probably would be far-left in the sense of making society more equitable in terms of MATERIAL goods and welfare to all citizens, but with the monarch having the final say. None of this really maps onto the political liberalism of the major US parties, as monarchists are typically seen as reactionaries or tyrants by political liberals on the right and left. Diana is likely conservative in an Amazonian context, being a princess and believing in the ideals of her culture—she typically doesn’t go against them much, unless they go insane due to bad writing, the times she goes against them seems to be when she wants to take the burden herself, since she’s part of the state and believes in her society.
As weird as it sounds, the Amazons are a conservative society that appears radical only because it’s focused more on social needs than the development of the individual within Western liberal democracies. It’s in a way similar to the Greeks, who were also conservative but had certain attitudes that would be found mainly on the far-left today.
