>>124595771>>124595825>you said that three timesBecause you kept lying and sticking to that poor argument.
>Literally said it in my first postNope, you only talked about the characters you liar.
>Wow look there it isAgain you said animation and talked about feature film budget which was the main focus of your dumb ranting on my post.
>The grass and bushes have textureThey don't moron, it's only outlines and cel grain which the characters have too.
>But not actually one shade and actually several shades and details like the steel shades and details in >>124593094No, it isn't and I already explained why.
>Same for >>124595089. Shaded, rivets, even more detailsAlready been through this and explained it to you and you don't bring anything new to the table on badly repeating the same arguments.
>are way more busy than this imageNo, brainlet.
>ee that a lamp chain and two small not-so-conspicuous panels and rivets are not as busy as >>124595089 rivets and holes and a huge panel and some colored lights and a grating and a joystick and a hallway down the middleWe were talking about the backgrounds in relation to this one
>>124593094, moron. Duh this
>>124595089 is less detailed than
>>124595213 , but both aren't as detailed as the TTG background.
>Except the wood panelingI was still talking about
>>124595213 this, poor spammer. And yas the new pic you posted is still more minimalist and limit to one shade for the walls and flour, most of the table is one color with two shades being seen on the edge.
Your writing become less and less coherent as your arguments keep falling apart. You think art is math and you count just count shit, you fail to grasp gradual and minor differences, you're fucking retard.
