>>121239220oh boy
nope, nope nope nope
what they've done, and the technical form matters here, is they've not used her in footage that was used in Superman & Lois (for which she'd be due an appearance fee per her contract for the original footage, or at scale if this for some reason wasn't specified as a possible future use) to represent those fictional events
what they have not done is erase her from Crisis, for which she will continue to be paid residuals whenever and wherever it is show, per SAG-AFTRA rules
given that she won't be appearing in any future episodes of anything, it's less a political statement and more a financial one; she would have made maybe a couple grand for that shot, which - I don't know, maybe she'd spend it on prettier women than ever look at you - she might not care about, but to the studio it's not really worth using the unedited footage what with the fees and the fact that unfamiliar viewers are going to wonder why Batwoman is different to the other Batwoman who's on after her
literally nobody cares what happens to the lesbians but you OP and I think that's neat