>>119990560>>119992325>Robotfags are unironically the scum of humanity and should be rated worse than furries and footfagsOh, get off your high horse.
>your trash would be just an artificial, unintelligent, soulless masturbation aid even if it did.You're making a lot of assumptions. People already use computers for sex and companionship as is.
>artificialWhat woman today isn't artificial is some sense? Plastic Surgery, hair dyes, makeup, shaving, fake eyelashes, hormone medication. Don't get me started on how hard it is to tell if a woman is putting on an act that she is insane. At least with a robot you know it's artificial, whereas with a human female it's hard to tell.
>unintelligentThe first robot wives probably won't be too intelligent, but as technology improves in the coming decades you could get a robo wife with an average intelligence. AI has come a long way so far.
>soulessI guess if you care about a human soul then this may be a problem if you want to meet your love in heaven. A lot of people believe that dogs don't have souls, yet no one would dare suggest that having a dog is a terrible thing. If you don't believe in souls this won't be a problem though.
>And after rubbing your dick to cold, hard metal, you will still fall asleep alone, just like how you do it now, except clutching a way more expensive dakimakura.Implying we won't make heated, silicone, artificial vaginas for a real feel. You would be falling asleep next to a robot, not yourself.
