>>118537347This is still the dumbest shit. I'm sure "Anna sans Elsa" was exactly what everybody was thinking in 2013. That's what everyone wanted from a Frozen sequel. And this
>>118538464 just makes it worse, how the hell do you advertise them as "Stronger Together" while also shoving out a book about how they're better apart?
Because I guarantee this thing is just damage control trying to justify something that, seven years ago, would have been considered absurd. They're in their proper places, they're happier than they've ever been, they're in their element, it's not what they thought they wanted but now they can't imagine anything else, this is totally what we always planned, you just don't like change, blah blah blah...
I should stop getting mad about this. I'm going to give myself an aneurysm.
