>>118252951Undoubtedly. For all the good it'd do, because frankly I don't think a nandroid can be an effective shield for a fully grown human. Like, if you take Ted as an exemple, even if he turn to the side he's still bigger than Emmy. It'd be like hiding behind a telephone pole, except even thinner and pleading the enemy to not execute you.
>>118252966I doubt they know about earlier Sterling products even in Canon actually, so that make sense.
But the moment they acknowledge it it's still going to be a problem, unless
>>118252988 said and they are made to not think about it.
It's still going to be a chaotic mess if someone try to talk to them about it.
Makes me wonder, if a soldier come back home where the family ahve a nandroid, and he try to talk to her about that one Sterling walking tank that saved his life, will she try to talk about it, deny it absurdly, or have a breakdown because she both have to talk to him but try her hardest to not compute the existence of same-brand killing machines?
