>>118036543Yes. Yes it would. The reason they're so fucking angry is because they think people like you are doing it to them and they don't have any other choice.
Have you ever seen that one 'Libertarian to Alt-Right pipeline' meme that gets posted in /pol/ more often than George Soros name?
That's how they see themselves, 'In an ideal world we'd be libertarian and treat everyone as individuals, this is not an ideal world, Hans, get the Wunderwaffer.'
The way to disarm /pol/, if you ever had such a thing in mind, would be to give them a few small, reasonable concessions.
Fuck it, I'll list a few:
>Yes, black people can be racist. No, whites aren't inherently racist, fuck off Crit-race snake oil salesman, we're not paying you for that shit>Yes there have been mistakes made in dealing with islamic radicals in our countries, we're not going to tolerate it or hide from it any more for fear of being called racist and we're going to focus on assimilating what we have before we bring anyone else in>Yes, your free speech does cover the right to drop racial slurs like you're a rap artist if you want to and we're opening up the market again so non-twatter alternatives can spring up for when you're banned and/or fired. Oh and Twatter is now a publisher not a platform, eat shit Jack, you made your bed, get fucked in it>No, it's not unreasonable to talk about the undue influence Cosmopolitan areas have on our discourse, yes some of these people are Jews but it's a city vs rural thing, no we're not going to just wangle it off as all Jews but you're allowed to talk about it without being persecuted from now on>Yes, Globalism has been bad for the little guy and we're going to do something about that, you includedBoom, done, knock off for a smoke break, you just deradicalized 80-90% of /pol/ users by giving them a way to vent their frustrations and talk openly rather than going directly to 'Day of the Soap on a Rope soon Comrade'
Do not pass go, do not collect £200
