>>117300454The game has no affiliation with the wiki, and they had to change the model there because, as is mentioned very clearly on the page for SCP-173, the wiki has permission from the artist to use that particular image for the sole and single purpose of hosting it for that article.
What's more, the case of the image for SCP-173 has been discussed extensively because it is so unique - part of the permission agreement is that the page lists the copyright for the image on the page itself, breaking immersion somewhat, instead of at the top of the comment thread. It is also very well known that the games have 0 affiliation with the wiki.
These are all things you could have easily known if you had more than a cursory familiarity with the wiki, but you clearly don't. You didn't just make an innocent mistake about the situation with SCP-173's image, and on top of that you also seem to fundamentally misunderstand why all these images were changed while SCP-173's won't be (because they either couldn't determine the copyright holder or couldn't get permission, both of which they did get for 173).
So, either you're lying and you are actively trying to misinform people on purpose, or you're retarded and/or gullible beyond belief. I'll let you choose which of the two you want to go with.