>>117162135>validate an outrage mobBy that logic, all these businesses supporting BLM made a bad move by appeasing people who would call them racist for saying otherwise or not weighing in on it at all.
It should not be ambiguous whether or not you oppose what most people consider to be a moral evil. Is it "validating an outrage mob" to say you're against murder, rape, or sex trafficking? No, it's called being a decent fucking human being. Which, if Netflix were, they would say "no, we do not support pedophilia", because decent human beings don't support that.
People would be a lot more willing to support a business that reflects such ethics and morals, and opposes what most people with even the slightest inkling of a conscience consider to be moral wrongs.
