>>116991210>Yes, but none of them were race focused.How does this harms you more than people who've actually experienced racism?
>Nuh-uh some guy called me cracker soiboi on twitterYeah, no.
Black Panther was made during a time where civil rights was going on. Of course it's going to touch race.
>Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons Both in welfare capitalism and in socialism people can get a social safety netThey we're WRONG, but for the RIGHT reasons, comprende?
They weren't capitalist, they were tribal monarchy.
>Not without substantial real or faked evidence, not in recent memory anyway. Even After Operation Desert Shield and the highway of death, the USA did not dare to attack Iraq and Saddam until they could procure some allegations on chemical weapons of Mass Destruction. Fake allegations, but allegations nonetheless. And this is when the USSR has been gone for a decade. During the Cold War the USA was even more careful, instead using a method now called Color Revolutions.
Okay, so why would Wakanda WANT to potentially suffer the same risk?
>But my point was precisely about that, meaning that you're shifting the goal posts of what I was on about. But again, why would Wakanda want to risk war? It was wrong what happened to Thomas Sankara and his country. Why would Wakanda allow themselves to potentially suffer the same way?
>Which is impossible.But a human male turning into a 10 feet green beast whenever he wants is more realistic? A scrawny kid getting impossible natty within minutes and getting frozen for over 80 years is more realistic?
A god of Thunder is more possible to you?
>Thats why I say the cartoon depicts it better, it has traditions and tribal aspects that sensibly meshes with the technology.But even in the comics and cartoons, they were still an advanced civilization. You're literally getting heated about a movie.
>but the CIA, who has agents world-wide didn't? many intruders were killed off. a Few were lucky.
