>>116669951>Try again, because as far as answers went that was pathetic.Okay. Amputation is highly effective vs necrosis of the limbs, but it's not a particularly good treatment.
It's a good stopgap to keep someone from dying, obviously.
However, if amputation took on the quality of affirming some intrinsic right of the necrosis-afflicted, and that developing alternative methods of dealing with necrosis was thus bigoted, hateful, or even denying someone's personhood, amputation suddenly becomes a very big problem for dealing with necrosis.
Since you're so fond of metaphors, it shouldn't be hard to extended this to the real phenomenons and theories of self-determined gender identity, and of those identities being entirely and wholly valid. Any treatments that would serve to treat or cure underlying gender dysphoria without affirming said self-determined gender identity implicitly denies the validity of self-determined gender identity. When denying the sociological theory of gender identity carries with it the risk of being labeled bigoted or hateful, It doesn't need to be a conspiracy, because it's doctrinal and self-enforcing.
If you want a well known (but relatively lenient, despite historical perception) example of this, look no further than Geocentrism.
>>116669956Oh, that's a very simple answer. It's when they tell me that the core of WC's struggle is fundamentally focused around her being a trans-analogue, as opposed to her more fundamental and core themes, they're just plain wrong. They're mistaking the skin for the skeleton, so to speak.
I don't like it when people are wrong.
