Whoa, look at all those replies. Seems like I struck a nerve.
>>116681046>there's more self-awareness than you think. Take that stick out of your butt.No one was talking about self-awareness, though. We were talking about the show being shit and having no fanbase.
>Well, at least some people try to make conversations with what they like and what could have been improved.Wrong thread. That
>>116665273 thread died with only 11 half-assed replies.
>>116681091>You keep saying no originality, please give an example of a show that is 100% original.I can't, but I can give you an example of a show that's 100% unoriginal:
you guessed it, it's OK K.O.!>The artwork being appeasing and the jokes being unfunny is 100% subjective opinions that you are trying to push as facts.The artwork is objectively bad, and the jokes being unfunny is a common complaint against the show.
>Seems like you just hate the show to hate it because someone in another KO thread told you that co hates it and all you have to back up your claim is repeating the same talking points every “bad show” gets.>blah blah blahThat's a lot of assumptions you've made there, and most of them are wrong. I know my shit about the show and OK KO fandom, because I'm one of the regulars here. More specifically, I'm one of the disappointed fans.
>>11668133>Those guys are crazyLike every and each anon on /co/. At least Star vs. and Amphibia have an actual fandom and actual discussion. In OK KO threads there's only relentless samefagging and fishing for waifu lewds.
>pedos who keep spamming Star/Marco/Jackie porn>pedosThey're like 14-16, OK KO pedos want to fuck obviously prebubescent looking (and badly drawn) characters like Dendy, Fink and K.O.
>and the anons who keep whining about that objectively terrible finaleAs if there's no whining in OK KO threads.
