>>116501686Hokay yeah, then we definitely differ on the definition of the word "prude". I'll look it up.
>"a person who is excessively or priggishly attentive to propriety or decorum"...yeah alright, fair enough. I always thought it meant specifically "a person who dislikes sexual content" which obviously I don't. But given that what's considered good decorum is thankfully shifting, I guess this does make sense.
Honestly, I don't mind traditional attractiveness, I just want there to be other stuff too. The definition of what's considered attractive is so narrow that I have trouble telling people apart.