>>115510939Why do corporations and banks support a movement calling for the end of police protection for normal people (they'll have private security, so they'll be fine), and is destroying their local, independent competitors? If it's for "good PR" then you have to ask the question, would this be good PR if there was any accuracy the reporting?
>>115510949So would the banks support something like Occupy if there was a "tipping point"? Nope. This then leads to the interesting question. If "all lives wont matter until black lives matter" then does declining wages matter? Does rising costs matter? Nope. Because we haven't reached the nebulous end point.
