>>115010693>DUR HURR UR STUPIDyes, you are stupid, as your statements have demonstrated.
>It does not change the fact that this is an intentionally misleading description.Yes, you are attempting to do this, but it has not succeeded because the points you are attempting to raise are utterly irrelevant. The point of contention is that the war was fought over the right of the southern states to maintain slavery, NOT about the north's reasons for opposing slavery. You are attempting (and failing) to mislead by ignoring the role of the southern states in enshrining slavery into their very constitutions at the point of secession. Discussion over, you've lost.
>>115010721credible data, AKA opening your eyes. i get it, too hard for you
