>>114694831>that's just the funny narrative you'd rather set for them.They're saying they want more voices for people of color and LGBTQ+. And oftentimes, these demands for more voices they want to reach at minimum a 40/60 level, if we're going with the idea that 50/50 is unattainable.That means we need to have a nearly even rate of:
Whites (Women + Men)
Blacks (Women + Men)
Latinos (Women + Men)
Asian-Americans (Women + Men)
Native-Americans (Women + Men)
Lesbians
Homosexuals
Transgenders (Women + Men)
Asexuals
Pansexuals
Non-binary
Animation productions where both the crew AND the characters reflect that diversity in order to be deemed as "fair". And once we reach that level, who knows. It might break down more into subgroups. Now it's not about just Asian-Americans, but specifically Korean, Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino voices.
People who complain about lack of diversity are never happy. We can have a dozen shows that all have the cast of Hey Arnold, but eventually, someone is going to complain that, "But it still stars a white boy and his white love interest".
When you consider that there are MANY 15 animation productions happening across the major studios at any given time, how the fuck are we supposed to balance out the ratio unless we flat out reject people in favor of their background?
