>>114491237What concepts did they reference? I traced it back and
>The arguments that are physical, like "materializing a parking spot" or "astral projection" (remote viewing), can easily be tested.How the fuck can you empirically test someone materializing their parking space through positive thought, or astral projection. Just because there are accounts of astral projection happening doesn't mean it's anything more than a shitty hallucination, but if you call it a shitty hallucination, you cannot prove these fuckers aren't actually moving their consciousness through the spirit realm, even though it's a bumfuck retarded idea.
>>114491237why do you believe anti aging is pop-sci. burden of proof is now on you, friend.
digitized consciousness is an incredible leap to make when we have such a limited current understand of consciousness. at least with anti aging, we have shitty mice experiments that provide at least light evidence to the idea. this is coming from someone who believes in both.
>>114491351That was one study. "Death will inevitably be cured" stems from a belief in
anti aging
digitized consciousness
and a bit of blind faith that "probably eventually someone will fix that shit"
>>114491370>statistical analysis partThis is actually intelligent. Okay then, I'll zoom wayyy back and approach it from a different angle. If someone tells me right now that all black people are stupid, "i know a guy" isn't that bad a response. There is no study that currently exists with your specified qualifications that shows "all black people are stupid." If someone were to make that claim to me right now, without any such study to support it, I could simply disregard it with "I know a smart black dude."
>changing local entropy means a system can last forever>we don't know what happens when we reach near-max entropy.xd
big crunch doesn't mean we all die bucko
>>114491359where's my money then?
