>>114101570You know, it wouldn't actually be too hard to do a story to justify the no kill rule, like have the superhero kill someone he believes to be a murderer that straight up attacks him, thus making him "completely justified" in killing him, but then later the superhero finds new evidence that reveals the guy actually wasn't the murderer and only attacked him because he was panicking at the shadowy figure chasing him down a dark alley.
Instead of falling back on some retarded "but if you kill him suddenly you'll turn into a complete psychopath who skins entire families alive because of an unpaid parking ticket" bullshit you have a completely believable scenario that shows why playing judge, jury, and executioner can have irreversible consequences.
