>>112327906why would your preconceptions of androgyny, which are predicated by your preconceptions of heretosexual reproductive classes and the various genders that spring from them, be applicable to genderless alien robots?
if anything you've assumed their gender here: there's no reason why they couldn't appear to hold "masculine" traits purely co-incidentally but actually be entirely without sex or gender, beyond crude androgyny
i mean the majority of them already have a bipedal, two-armed robot form and there's no fucking reason for that since they also have wildly impractical alt-forms that have to be partially visible in their biped forms, so all that evolution shit we did to arrive at this stage is clearly out the fucking window, yet they stick to bipeds as a majority common form
if you're going to allow them that co-incidence without comment even when they're explicitly stated not to have evolved but made by gods, or when they've evolved out of crap in the wilderness, or when they've been constructed by a race of floating tentacle monsters, then you're damned fucking right you're going to accept that they're entirely genderless and sexless and any perceptions you have to the contrary are simply your own bias
