>>112182396>Yes except half of what I said there
No? Seems thats what you did on my post.>it wasn't just them...reusing a trope?
It was an incredibly boring and dull episode that had nothing of worth besides more Pink teasing and introducing a new villain that could have worked if they had done it in creative ways. They decided to go the laziest route possible.>Both lines happened
One had more weight than the other.>Here is the whole episode> You say before you are annoyed how the characters are acting obnoxiously nice or obnoxiously mean obviously referring to Mean and Nice Lapis when in reality Nice Lapis wasn't acting obnoxiously nice at all.
Yes, she was. She was acting all childish and the ignorance of her actions was played off as cute and not threatening compared to the other one who was more antagonistic and rude. And even if she wasn't, the fact that you had no complaints about how I said it of every other character makes my point that the new gems introduced are generic right. Even if this "Nice Lapis" (again, LITERALLY on her name, I don't understand how you don't get this) was different from the others (which I dont think), there are still the Roses, the gems on Beach City, Bluebird, mean Lapis and Pink Pearl to refer to.>You literally say yourself that she made fun of Lapis' heartfelt song she was acting like a total bitch
Never said that. You're bringing up things that have nothing to do with this.>no point to this though
You're right, I'm clearly thinking about these answers while you shat these out since you have no real counterpoint to my criticism. Why continue arguing with you when you clearly are just a fan who doesn't want to think about any criticism of their favorite show except their own? You won't learn anything and have just reinforced my arguments.