>>111943081>the argument.>the>THE>implying SINGULARWell, you utterly retarded nigger, that's your problem right there.
"Climate change" isn't an argument.
It's a ridiculously large and complex issues that range on everything from global, to personal, to geopolitical scales, in regards to different data about different effects that various industrial practices may or may not cause.
Beyond making angry faces and going "EAT THE BUGS", what is her argument? Nuke India and China? Return to pre-industrial living standards? Grow algae seas, or launch mirrors into space (these have been legitimate propositions to global warming, not just me memeing)?
Something that a 16 year old goblinoid has literally not been alive long enough to sufficiently look into, nor understand.
